One ant, arguing with another ant ...

One of the common frustrations church planters often face is a kind of protectionist turf consciousness that they meet from established churches in their target areas. If the established church, however small or weak it may be, discovers that a new church might begin nearby, the church planter must walk very carefully in order to not arouse hostility and fear before he even begins.

Wise church planters will take their time before moving into a neighborhood, establishing relationships with resident pastors and local Christian groups, learning their triumphs and frustrations and eventually asking for their advice. Unfortunately even this may not be enough.

Over the course of my life in ministry I have personally seen churches in Washington, DC, Boston, New York City, and even small towns reject the idea that a new church is needed. “What’s wrong with us?” is usually the unspoken question. “You’re implying we aren’t up to the job?” One pastor had to change denominations in order to gain permission to plant a badly needed church in a small college town. The already-there-church had a congregation of fewer than 100 people, and saw no need to change anything to win the college community; yet they still fought the idea that another church might win people that they could not.

The truth is, the natural outward face of churches has a shelf life, or as the Brits call it, an expiry date, somewhere around 15-25 years. Unless there has been a deliberate strategy of outward facing church planting and evangelism, by then insider needs tip the balance over outsider needs, and the church’s metabolism gradually shifts to an inward facing one. It isn’t that those who are insiders — members — shouldn’t have their needs met ... youth groups, Mom’s groups, Bible studies, counseling, and more are all important. But if the members lose sight of the Prime Directive ... “Go and make disciples ...” they can fall into the habit of just “doing church as usual,” thus becoming deaf to the needs and sensibilities of skeptical outsiders.

If, in the words of Alan Hirsch, we are only thinking of red water Christianity, this makes a certain amount of sense. If we see the vast expanse of blue water around us it doesn’t make sense at all. [And NO, this red/blue illustration has NOTHING to do with politics, but fish blood!]

If, in the metaphor, food is perceived as scarce, sharks and other predators will battle one another over the food supply, leaving the water red with blood. But if the whole wide blue ocean is teaming with life then there is no need to fight over the limited number of believers.

If all we are doing is shuffling the saints or stealing sheep, then, yes, there is reason to fear that a new church plant might lure away members (even the church shoppers/church hoppers take up seats on Sunday morning, making things seem more lively.)

But if our sights are set on winning those who don’t yet know Jesus, the supply is nearly infinite. As Terry Gyger, former Director of the PCA’s Mission to North America church planting committee said “It’s like one ant arguing with another ant over who gets to eat the elephant.”

See the excerpt from Neil Powell and John James’ book on collaboration in Birmingham, England. We must remember that our mandate is to reach the unreached rather than hoard the spiritual and material wealth God has given us. It wasn’t ours to begin with, and giving it away in the form of people and money to start new churches is the only way for a church to remain vital.

---

Thank you for subscribing to the Redeemer Report. If you would like to support the work of Redeemer in NYC, please use the button below to make a gift.

Make a gift

Articles in this Issue

		Equipping ministers to effectively walk with anxious people Redeemer Counseling Services
		Together for the city Neil Powell and John James of Birmingham, England
		HFNY is adding five new affiliates!
		Download a Free MP3 of a sermon
		Elders/Deeks: Nomination month is underway